fixed various syntax errors keeping the code from functioning: #1
+9
−9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…g "scripts." on line 13, (un)indent on lines 611 and 618 of inspector. various ] and ) issues on ln 245, 328, 445, 486, and 599, change += to + on ln 259 of solver.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixed various syntax errors keeping the code from functioning: missing "scripts." on line 13, (un)indent on lines 611 and 618 of inspector. various ] and ) issues on ln 245, 328, 445, 486, and 599, change += to + on ln 259 of solver.
I wanted to use your fork of this extension after reading the dialog between you and tkalayci7 and being disappointed in how the solver issue was resolved (or wasn't), but I found that in its present state the code won't run due to lots of minor syntax typos and although I don't know if you even still care aboutt this script I figured that if you do get around to trying to run it again eventually, you'd have to resolve these same issues and since I've already done the work, I could save you some time with this PR.
Nothing functional or substantional, just syntax to get it to stop bailing with errors.